Thursday, April 22, 2021

 20 April 21

Here is your first draft so far.

** **

Draft 1 of Dialogues

ONE

Being Human is divided into three parts: the physical, another is spiritual, and a third is a clear consciousness in understanding the difference. This understanding radiates from the combination of the physical brain/body enclosing the measurable physical/emotional heart and rational mind as separate from the attributes of spiritually unmeasurable heartansoulanmind. The concept through this autobiographical account is to provide a self-study guide to help balance herorhis late-in-life imperfect nature to better personally speculate on how to meet an Afterlife, if indeed, one or many exist.

Below are four definitions alluded to throughout this autobiographical dialogue between a man recently dead and his newly discovered spiritual attendant in a reverent circumstance of mutual consciousness. Within this framework, nothing exists but two-dimensional thought in words—the physical aspects of being human no longer valid except in ethereal memory. 

Spiritual adj. the spiritual dimension of human experience: psychological; incorporeal, intangible, otherworldly, 

ethereal; transcendent, mystic, mystical. Antonyms: physical, 

material, corporeal.

 

Physical adj. 1 in the flesh; rare somatic. 3 our spiritual relationship: earthly, worldly, terrestrial, earthbound, nonspiritual, unspiritual, material; carnal, fleshly, sensual; mortal, human, temporal.everything physical in the universe: material, concrete, in the universe: intangible, palpable, visible, real.Antonyms: spiritual, abstract, intangible.

 

Consciousness noun: awareness, wakefulness, alertness, responsiveness: awareness, 

alertness, responsiveness, sentience. 2 awareness of, knowledge of the existence of, alertness to, sensitivity to, a realization of, cognizance of, mindfulness of, perception of, apprehension of, recognition of. Antonyms:  unconsciousness. 

 

Conscience noun: an inner sense of right and wrong; a sense of right, moral sense, still small voice, inner voice within, morals standards, values, within; principles, ethics, creed, beliefs; scruples, qualms.  

 

Selected and edited from - Oxford American Writer’s Thesaurus

** **

22 April 21

Busy day. You saw Kim and Paul at Scramblers for breakfast. You saw Fritz for lunch, and a joy it was, plus he loaned you a book on Students in the 1960's at Ohio State University. You are looking forward to reading it from cover to cover. You postponed your and Carol's Tesla Y driving experience until next Tuesday. Chances are good (to your surprise) that you will order a Tesla Y sometime next week. It was a good day. Do not fret about not writing so regularly as in the 'old days' with me, the Amorella. That part of you is burnt out. The obsession is gone. You, the writer, are being reborn, so to speak. Post, and send to Fritz. - Amorella

Monday, April 19, 2021

 Monday, 19 April 21

We need to set up names for ourselves. How about Ms. Cointoss for me and Mr. Randy Sample for you? 

1503 hrs. That's funny -- Cointoss and Randy Sample. Any other characters?

No. Just the two of us. You are my companion-in-the-moment. You have no other companions in the story. 

1508 hrs. Do you have any companions?

All off stage, so to speak. 

1510 hrs. We could make it a stage play then, similar to Wilder's Our Town

I prefer we write it as a book otherwise titled, Dialogues. 

1538 hrs. Plato's Dialogues don't fit as a model, that's for sure. Confessions by St. Augustine might, though. 

** **

Confessions (Augustine)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Confessions (Latin: Confessiones) is an autobiographical work by Saint Augustine of Hippo, consisting of 13 books written in Latin between AD 397 and 400.[1] The piece outlines Saint Augustine's sinful youth and his conversion to Christianity. Modern English translations are sometimes published under the title The Confessions of Saint Augustine to distinguish the book from other books with similar titles. Its original title was Confessions in Thirteen Books, and it was composed to be read aloud, with each book being a complete unit.[2]

Confessions is generally considered one of Augustine's most important texts. It is widely seen as the first Western Christian autobiography ever written (Ovid had invented the genre at the start of the first century AD with his Tristia) and was an influential model for Christian writers throughout the Middle Ages. Professor Henry Chadwick wrote that Confessions will "always rank among the great masterpieces of western literature."[3]

 

Summary

The work is not a complete autobiography, as it was written during Saint Augustine's early 40s, and he lived long afterward, producing another important work, The City of God. Nonetheless, it provides an unbroken record of his development of thought and is the most complete record of any person from the 4th and 5th centuries. It is a significant theological work featuring spiritual meditations and insights.

In work, Augustine writes about how he regrets having led a sinful and immoral life. He discusses his regrets for following the Manichaean religion and believing in astrology. He writes about his friend Nebridius's role in helping to persuade him that astrology was not only incorrect but evil and Saint Ambrose's role in his conversion to Christianity. The first nine books are autobiographical, and the last four are commentary and significantly more philosophical. He shows intense sorrow for his sexual sins and writes on the importance of sexual morality. The books were written as prayers to God, thus the title, based on the Psalms of David, and it begins with "For Thou hast made us for Thyself, and our hearts are restless till they rest in Thee."[4] The work is thought to be divisible into books which symbolize various aspects of the Trinity and trinitarian belief.

Outline (by the book)

1.   His infancy and boyhood up to age 14. Starting with his infancy, Saint Augustine reflects on his personal childhood to draw universal conclusions about the nature of infancy: the child is inherently violent if left to its own devices because of Original Sin. Later, he reflects on choosing pleasure and reading secular literature over studying Scripture, choices which he later comes to understand as ones for which he deserved the punishment of his teachers. However, he did not recognize that during his childhood.

2.   Augustine continues to reflect on his adolescence, during which he recounts two examples of his grave sins that he committed as a sixteen-year-old: the development of his God-less lust and the theft of a pear from his neighbor's orchard, despite never wanting for food. In this book, he explores why he and his friends stole pears when he had many better pears of his own. He explains his feelings as he ate the pears and threw the rest away to the pigs. Augustine argues that he most likely would not have stolen anything had he not been in the company of others who could share in his sin.

3.   He begins the study of rhetoric at Carthage, where he develops a love of wisdom through his exposure to Cicero's Hortensius. He blames his pride for lacking faith in Scripture, so he finds a way to seek the truth regarding good and evil through Manichaeism. At the end of this book, his mother, Monica, dreams about her son's re-conversion to Catholic doctrine.

4.   Between the ages of 19 and 28, Augustine forms a relationship with an unnamed woman who, though faithful, is not his lawfully wedded wife, with whom he has a son, Adeodatus. At the same time that he returned to Tagaste, his hometown, to teach, a friend fell sick, was baptized in the Catholic Church, recovered slightly, then died. The death of his friend depresses Augustine, who then reflects on the meaning of love of a friend in a human sense versus love of a friend in God; he concludes that his friend's death affected him severely because of his lack of love in God. Things he used to love become hateful to him because everything reminds him of what was lost. Augustine then suggests that he began to love his life of sorrow more than his fallen friend. He closes this book with his reflection that he had attempted to find truth through the Manicheans and astrology, yet devout Church members, who he claims are far less intellectual and prideful, have found truth through greater faith in God.

5.   While Saint Augustine is aged 29, he begins to lose faith in Manichean teachings, which starts when the Manichean bishop Faustus visits Carthage. Augustine is unimpressed with the substance of Manichaeism, but he has not yet found something to replace it. He feels a sense of resigned acceptance to these fables as he has not yet formed a spiritual core to prove their falsity. He moves to teach in Rome, where the education system is more disciplined. He does not stay in Rome for long because his teaching is requested in Milan, where he encounters Ambrose's bishop (Saint Ambrose). He appreciates Ambrose's style and attitude, and Ambrose exposes him to a more spiritual, figurative perspective of God, which leads him into a position as catechumen of the Church.

6.   The sermons of Saint Ambrose draw Augustine closer to Catholicism, which he begins to favor over other philosophical options. In this section, his personal troubles, including ambition, continue, at which point he compares a beggar, whose drunkenness is "temporal happiness," with his hitherto failure at discovering happiness.[5] Augustine highlights the contribution of his friends Alypius and Nebridius in his discovery of religious truth. Monica returns at the end of this book and arranges a marriage for Augustine, who separates from his previous wife, finds a new mistress, and deems himself a "slave of lust."[6]

7.   In his mission to discover the truth behind good and evil, Augustine is exposed to the Neoplatonist view of God. However, he finds fault with this thought because he thinks that they understand the nature of God without accepting Christ as a mediator between humans and God. He reinforces his opinion of the Neoplatonists through the likeness of a mountain top: "It is one thing to see, from a wooded mountain top, the land of peace, and not to find the way to it [...] it is quite another thing to keep to the way which leads there, which is made safe by the care of the heavenly Commander, where they who have deserted the heavenly army may not commit their robberies, for they avoid it as a punishment."[7] From this point, he picks up the works of the apostle Paul who "seized [him] with wonder."[8]

8.   He further describes his inner turmoil on whether to convert to Christianity. Two of his friends, Simplicianus and Ponticianus, tell Augustine stories about the conversions of Marius Victorinus and Saint Anthony. While reflecting in a garden, Augustine hears a child's voice chanting, "take up and read."[9] Augustine picks up a book of St. Paul's writings (codex Apostoli, 8.12.29) and reads the passage it opens to, Romans 13:13–14: "Not in revelry and drunkenness, not in debauchery and wantonness, not in strife and jealousy; but put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and as for the flesh, take no thought for its lusts."[10] This action confirms his conversion to Catholicism. His friend Alypius follows his example.

9.   In preparation for his baptism, Augustine concludes his teaching of rhetoric. Saint Ambrose baptizes Augustine along with Adeodatus and Alypius. Augustine then recounts how the church at Milan, with his mother in a leading role, defends Ambrose against the persecution of Justina. Upon his return with his mother to Africa, they share a religious vision in Ostia. Soon after, Saint Monica dies, followed soon after by his friends Nebridius and Verecundus. By the end of this book, Augustine remembers these deaths through the prayer of his newly adopted faith: "May they remember with holy feeling my parents in this transitory light, and my brethren under Thee, O Father, in our Catholic Mother [the Church], and my fellow citizens in the eternal Jerusalem, for which the pilgrimage of Thy people sighs from the start until the return. In this way, her last request of me will be more abundantly granted her in the prayers of many through these my confessions than through my own prayers."[11]

10.                Augustine shifts from personal memories to introspective evaluation of the memories themselves and of the self as he continues to reflect on the values of confessions, the significance of prayer, and the means through which individuals can reach God. Through both this last point and his reflection on the body and the soul, he arrives at a justification for the existence of Christ.

11.                Augustine analyzes the nature of creation and of time as well as its relation with God. He explores issues surrounding presentism. He considers three kinds of time in the mind: the present concerning past things, which is the memory; the present concerning things that are present, which is contemplation; and the present for things that are in the future, which is expected. He relies on Genesis, especially the texts concerning the creation of the sky and the earth, throughout this book to support his thinking.

12.                Through his discussion of creation, Augustine relates the nature of the divine and the earthly as part of a thorough analysis of both the rhetoric of Genesis and the plurality of interpretations that one might use to analyze Genesis. Comparing the scriptures to spring with streams of water spreading over an immense landscape, he considers that there could be more than one true interpretation, and each person can draw whatever true conclusions from the texts.

13.                He concludes the text by exploring an allegorical interpretation of Genesis, through which he discovers the Trinity and the significance of God's creation of man. Based on his interpretation, he espouses the significance of rest as well as the divinity of Creation: "For, then shalt Thou rest in us, in the same way, that Thou workest in us now [...] So, we see these things which Thou hast made because they exist, but they exist because Thou seest them. We see, externally, that they exist, but internally, that they are good; Thou hast seen them made, in the same place where Thou didst see them as yet to be made."[12]

Purpose

Confessions were not only meant to encourage conversion, but they offered guidelines for how to convert. Saint Augustine extrapolates from his own experiences to fit others' journeys. Augustine recognizes that God has always protected and guided him. This is reflected in the structure of the work. Augustine begins each book within Confessions with a prayer to God. For example, both books VIII and IX begin with "you have broken the chains that bound me; I will sacrifice in your honor."[13]Because Augustine begins each book with a prayer, Albert C. Outler, a Professor of Theology at Southern Methodist University, argues that Confessions is a "pilgrimage of grace [...] [a] retrac[ing] [of] the crucial turnings of the way by which [Augustine] had come. And since he was sure that it was God’s grace that had been his prime mover in that way, it was a spontaneous expression of his heart that cast his self-recollection into the form of a sustained prayer to God."[14] Not only does Confessions glorify God, but it also suggests God’s help in Augustine’s path to redemption.

Written after the legalization of Christianity, Confessions dated from an era where martyrdom was no longer a threat to most Christians, as was the case two centuries earlier. Instead, a Christian’s struggles were usually internal. Augustine clearly presents his struggle with worldly desires such as lust. Augustine’s conversion was quickly followed by his ordination as a priest in 391 CE and then his appointment as bishop in 395 CE. Such rapid ascension certainly raised criticism of Augustine. Confessions were written between 397–398 CE, suggesting self-justification as a possible motivation for the work. With the words "I wish to act in truth, making my confession both in my heart before you and in this book, before the many who will read it" in Book X Chapter 1,[15] Augustine both confesses his sins and glorifies God through humility in His grace, the two meanings that define "confessions,"[16] to reconcile his imperfections not only to his critics but also to God.

Hermeneutics

St. Augustine suggested a method to improve the Biblical exegesis in the presence of challenging passages. Readers shall believe all the Scripture is inspired by God and that each author wrote nothing in which he didn't believe personally or that he believed to be false. Readers must distinguish philologically, and keep separate, their own interpretations, the written message, and the originally intended meaning of the messenger and author (in Latin: intention).[17]

Disagreements may arise "either as to the truth of the message itself or as to the messenger's meaning" (XII.23). The truthfulness of the message itself is granted by God, who inspired it to the extensor and who made possible the transmission and spread of the content across centuries and among believers.[17]

In principle, the reader cannot ascertain what the author had in mind when he wrote a biblical book. Still, he has the duty to do his best to approach that original meaning and intention without contradicting the letter of the written text. The interpretation must stay "within the truth" (XII.25) and not outside it.[17]

Audience

Much of the information about Augustine comes directly from his own writing. Augustine’s Confessions provide significant insight into the first thirty-three years of his life. Augustine does not paint himself as a holy man but as a sinner. The sins that Augustine confesses are of many different severities and of many different natures, such as lust/adultery, stealing, and lies. For example, in the second chapter of Book IX, Augustine references his choice to wait three weeks until the autumn break to leave his teaching position without causing a disruption. He wrote that some "may say it was sinful of me to allow myself to occupy a chair of lies even for one hour." [18]. In the introduction to the 1961 translation by R.S. Pine-Coffin, he suggests that this harsh interpretation of Augustine’s own past is intentional. His audience sees him as a sinner blessed with God’s mercy instead of as a holy figurehead.[19] Because the sins Augustine describes are of a rather common nature (e.g., the theft of pears when a young boy), these examples might also enable the reader to identify with the author and make it easier to follow Augustine's footsteps on his personal road to conversion. This identification is an element of the protreptic and paraenetic character of the Confessions.[20][21]

Due to the nature of Confessions, it is clear that Augustine was not only writing for himself but that the work was intended for public consumption. Augustine’s potential audience included baptized Christians, catechumens, and those of other faiths. In his book The Body and Society, Peter Brown writes that Confessions targeted "those with similar experience to Augustine’s own."[22] Furthermore, with his background in Manichean practices, Augustine had a unique connection to those of the Manichean faith. Confessions thus constitute an appeal to encourage conversion.

Selected and edited from Wikipedia

** **

You looked into other sources but found none of your likings. 

2128 hrs. What questions would Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle ask in such a dialogue as this? What questions would modern philosophers ask?

What questions would a guardian angel named Cointoss ask a dead man, is more to the point.

2200 hrs. Then the question is, "Who was I"?

And now dead, who are you still? Post, and send to Fritz.

Saturday, April 17, 2021

 17 April 2021

You worked in the outback, raking and then spraying to kill the many thicket bushes starting to come back; other natural foliage is welcome to return. You notice that I prefer the ariel typeset rather than the script type this time around. You likewise changed your habit. Subtle but effective, I imagine. - Amorella

2123 hrs. The less casual and laidback style has gone to the wayside. Where have you been this last year? 

You survived without my presence. The passion left and has not returned; it has with anecdotal evidence been 'burned away' (with a memorable wink to Wilder's "Our Town"). 

2212 hrs. I did not consciously remember "burned away," but it sounds authentic. I did some checking. 

** **



Our Town
Thornton Wilder



THE STORY continued

ACT III

NOTE: According to Wilder's stage directions, the dead "do not turn their heads or their eyes to the right or left, but they sit in a quiet without stiffness. When they speak, their tone is a matter of fact, without sentimentality." Wilder wants the audience to notice that the dead have lost their emotional attachment to the living. Later, you will understand that even this becomes a comment on what it means to be alive. 

The Stage Manager takes up his usual position, and when the house lights go down, he begins to speak. Nine years have gone by this time. And this is a different part of Grover's Corners, "an important part," on a hilltop. He talks about the beauty of the setting and points out the oldest graves belonging to the "strong-minded" settlers. Genealogists, paid by people who want to be certain they have colonial ancestors, visit the graves. "Wherever you come near the human race, there's layers and layers of nonsense," he says. Then he points out the Civil War veterans. "New Hampshire boys... had a notion that the Union ought to be kept together, though they'd never seen more than fifty miles of it themselves... And they went and died about it." 

Wilder is pointing out that humans are both silly and noble. There is no such thing as "either/or" when it comes to an understanding the human race. It contains all possibilities. 

Finally, the Stage Manager points to the actors sitting on chairs. Mrs. Gibbs, who worried so much about her husband, is dead. So are Simon Stimson, Mrs. Soames, and Wally Webb. 

NOTE: At the beginning of the play, the Stage Manager mentioned the deaths of several characters, including Mrs. Gibbs. It wasn't upsetting because you hadn't met them yet. And he didn't talk about every character's death. Now, learning about the death of Mrs. Gibbs and of Wally causes a pang. You've met them. They aren't just names anymore. Why do you think Wilder has done this? You may recall the question, "How's it going to end?" Wilder wants you to realize that most people go through life asking such questions when they know the answer perfectly well. Everyone is going to die. Yet, everyone acts as if death is unexpected. 

Wilder uses the Stage Manager to state some other beliefs. "We all know that something is eternal. And it ain't houses, and it ain't names... That something has to do with human beings." There is, he says, something within each one of us that lives on beyond our own life force. Is he talking about the soul? The Stage Manager says that all the great thinkers have been saying it throughout history, but people have trouble remembering the idea. "We all know," says the Stage Manager. Is he right? Do we all know? Does Wilder think we all know? 

NOTE: Wilder has been accused of being too much like a teacher, hitting you over the head with his message. Do you think this is a valid criticism? Or is the sugarcoating of humor and emotion thick enough to make the message go down easily? Or is Wilder raising questions rather than insisting on certain answers? 

In one of the most lyrical passages in the play, the Stage Manager describes how the "earth part" of people has burned away after death, and the "eternal part" comes out. The part that attaches people to the earth, memory and personal identity, has to disappear. (This is why the actors in the chairs speak and behave passively. The earth part of them is burning out.) It is not that the dead cease to care about the living; they hardly remember what it was to be alive. Do you suppose that this is the perfection that people talked about earlier in the play?   . . .

Selected from - http://pinkmonkey.com/booknotes/barrons/ourtownx.asp

** **

2221 hrs. Are you suggesting this bolded concept should be a set piece for this autobiography?

Yes. You will move from Caesar to Wilder at this point. - Amorella

1026 hrs. Interesting. The tone of thinking here appears at a higher, more intellectual, and consciously stable level. I cannot be doing this without your guidance. The tone carried is that while writing, I am among Wilder's dead in the play.

As you wish, you are the writer. - Amorella '

1039 hrs. Upon your return to the Notes on 14 April, you said, "Who to better play the guardian Angel than me, Amorella?"

My tonal construction will be similar to that of the Stage Manager in Wilder's play. You will be more comfortable seeing me in this light. - Amorella

1050 hrs. I am glad I am sharing this with Fritz. I am not comfortable not sharing. 

At present, let's share with Fritz and on the blog. - Amorella

2257 hrs. Strange, I don't think of the blog as a sharing because no one reads it anyway. 

You are a very private man; there is no need to exploit that. Send this on to Fritz. He is a very private man also. - Amorella

* * *

Friday, April 16, 2021

 * * *

16 April 2021

1056 hrs. Translation:

** **

Gallic War by Julius Caesar 


Loeb Classical Library 1917

 

https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Caesar/Gallic_War/1A*.html

 

1 Gaul is a whole divided into three parts, one of which is inhabited by the Belgae, another by the Aquitani, and a third by a people called in their own tongue Celtae, in the Latin Galli. All these are different one from another in language, institutions, and laws. The Galli (Gauls) are separated from the Aquitani by the river Garonne, from the Belgae by the Marne and the Seine. Of all these peoples the Belgae are the most courageous, because they are farthest removed from the culture and civilization of the Province, and least often visited by merchants introducing the commodities that make for effeminacy; and also, because they are nearest to the Germans dwelling beyond the Rhine, with whom they are continually at war. For this cause the Helvetii also excel the rest of the Gauls in valour, because they are struggling in almost daily fights with the Germans, either endeavouring to keep them out of Gallic territory or waging an aggressive warfare in German territory. The separate part of the country which, as has been said, is occupied by the Gauls, starts from the river Rhone, and is bounded by the river Garonne, the Ocean, and the territory of the Belgae; moreover, on the side of the Sequani and the Helvetii, it touches on the river Rhine; and its general trend is northward. The Belgae, beginning from the edge of the Gallic territory, reach to the lower part of the river Rhine, bearing towards the north and east. Aquitania, starting from the Garonne, reaches to the Pyrenees and to that part of the Ocean which is by Spain: its bearing is between west and north.

** **

** **

Classic Style: Prose as a Window Into the World

Transcript

The last writing style we’re going to look at is what has been called “classic style”.

It’s quite different from the other styles we’ve looked at, and it’s gotten some buzz recently with the publication of Steven Pinker’s book The Sense of Style, subtitled “the thinking person’s guide to writing in the 21st century”.

In the book he strongly advocates for classic style as an ideal to which academic writers should aspire. . ..

Classic Style

The model scene for classic style is one person speaking to another, a conversation between equals.

The writer uses prose as a window to describe a world, and to draw attention to the objects and actions going on within this world.

The assertions, the claims that the writer wants to make, are depicted in this world, and the writer tries to get the audience, the reader, to see what is depicted by positioning the reader so that he or she can see what the writer sees.

The writer wants to reveal some truth about the world, and their goal is to get the reader to see this truth, through a conversational dialogue about the world that the writer has created, but that is imaginatively accessible to both of them.

This is the discursive setup for classic style. . ..

Classic style aims at the presentation of an objective, disinterested truth about the world — a truth that can be confirmed by anyone with a suitable background and position to see it.

Second, this is also very different from reflexive style, where the author wants to draw the reader’s attention to the act of writing itself, and to the challenges the writer faces.

The classic writer wants the reader to see through the text — hence the metaphor of a window — into the world depicted by the text, because that’s the subject of the writing, not the writing itself. You don’t want the reader to notice smudges or cracks in the window, or even that the world is being framed by a window — you just want them to pay attention to the scene depicted through the window.

Third, classic style is different from practical style.

Classic and practical style have a common interest in clarity and directness in writing, but they value this for different reasons.

In practical style, clarity is a virtue because its primary goal is to be easily understood by the reader, so that it can help the reader with whatever practical problem they’re facing.

Classic style isn’t concerned with solving a practical problem for the reader.

In classic style we value clarity and simplicity because TRUTH is clear and simple — this is a presupposition of the conceptual stance that grounds classic style. Hence the title of Thomas and Turner’s book on classic style, Clear and Simple as the Truth.

A fourth point I want to note about classic style is that the goal of writing in this style is a kind of performance.

When the writer is able to create this world and successfully lead the reader through the scene, that’s a kind of artfully constructed performance. . ..

The goal of writing in classic style is a kind of performance that presents all truths are expressible and knowable in the way described, that the truths being presented are objective features of the world, and the writer is confident in making these assertions without hedging or qualifying.

But the writer knows that this is a performance, it’s a pretense.

The real writer — you and I, sitting at our laptops struggling to find the right words, we don’t have to believe any of this. But when we choose to write in the classic style, we’re choosing to embrace these fictions, like an actor on stage playing a role, or a musician performing during a concert.

You can be as skeptical and uncertain and philosophically sophisticated as you want in real life, but when writing in the classic mode you hide that skepticism and uncertainty and philosophical sophistication for the sake of presenting a truth in as clear and compelling a way as possible.

Any writing style requires adopting a persona of some kind — this is the persona of the classic writer.

Summary

Here’s a summary of the main points.

  • Classic style views prose as a window to the world. 
  • The model scene is one where the writer and the reader are in conversation.
  • The writer’s goal is to depict a world that presents a truth, and to position the reader in such a way that the reader can see what the writer sees, and thereby confirm the truth that the writer is presenting. 
  • Truth is understood to be clear, simple and verifiable. 
  • Classic style is a performative style, where it’s understood by the writer that the truth may not be clear or simple, but when writing in the classic mode the writer aims to present truth as clear and simple and verifiable — this the persona that the writer adopts, a presupposition of the conceptual stance that grounds classic style. 

In the next video we’ll look at some examples of classic writing and how classic style can help improve your academic writing.

https://criticalthinkeracademy.com/courses/22120/lectures/315866

** **

1152 hours. On Being Human: A Commentary appears to be a good working title. 

**

Gaul is a whole divided into three parts, one of which is inhabited by the Belgae, another by the Aquitani, and a third by a people called in their own tongue Celtae, in the Latin Galli. All these are different one from another in language, institutions, and laws.

**

Being Human is a whole divided into three parts, one of which is physical, another is spiritual, and a third is the clear consciousness to know the exact difference.

Being Human is divided into three parts: the physical, another is spiritual, and a third is a clear consciousness in understanding the difference.

There you have it, the first sentence of your book, now titled, BEING HUMAN: A COMMENTARY. - Amorella

1212 hrs. Yes, I have a beginning.

Being Human is divided into three parts: the physical, another is spiritual, and a third is a clear consciousness in understanding the difference. This understanding radiates from the combination of the physical brain/body enclosing the measurable physical/emotional heart and rational mind as separate from the attributes of spiritually unmeasurable heartansoulanmind. The concept through this autobiography is to provide a self-study guide to help balance herorhis late-in-life imperfect nature to better personally speculate on how to meet an Afterlife, if indeed, one, or even many, may exist. 

Your Grammarly performance is 100 percent on the above and suggests this work is geared for the college not the high school level reader. 

1254 hrs. The problem I am foreseeing is that the spiritual heartansoulanmind is not verifiable scientifically as such although such subjective evidence is available through observation of self and others. 

Send this to Fritz and post in current blog. - Amorella

  20 April 21 Here is your first draft so far. ** ** Draft 1 of Dialogues ONE Being Human  is divided into three parts: the physical, anothe...